Comprehensive Trademark Search

Conducting a search for similar trademarks before proceeding with registration can save time and money. Such a search helps prevent obvious duplications of existing marks and avoids the expense of nonrefundable application fees.

Emerging companies have a better chance of making name changes during their early stages, compared to later years after investing significantly in a brand and its associated reputation.

Conducting searches within the USPTO database doesn't automatically grant superior rights to a specific mark. It's possible that someone is already using a similar mark, albeit without USPTO registration. In such cases, your registration might face challenges from the owner of the previously used mark, based on common law trademark rights.

Additionally, please review our GUIDELINES BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

Not all names are automatically eligible for trademark approval from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Names are often categorized by the USPTO as “generic,” “descriptive,” “suggestive,” “arbitrary,” or “fanciful.” The likelihood of a trademark application being registered by the USPTO is higher when the name is less “generic” and more “fanciful.”

Generic names seldom receive protection. For instance, a company producing screwdrivers attempting to trademark “The Screwdriver Company” is unlikely to succeed. Similarly, purely descriptive names usually do not secure registrations from the USPTO. For instance, “The Metal Screwdriver Company” is improbable to be approved as it merely describes a metal screwdriver.

Descriptive marks can obtain trademark protection if they have acquired what’s known as “secondary meaning.” This means that despite their descriptive nature, the public associates the product with a specific company due to its fame. One example is IBM or International Business Machines. However, newer companies usually lack the recognition necessary to establish a secondary meaning. Generic names rarely achieve secondary meaning, making their registration with the USPTO unlikely.

The prospects of approval are generally better for suggestive marks, which subtly imply quality or other attributes of the company. For example, “Herculean Screwdriver Company” might have a better chance of USPTO registration than “Strong Screwdriver,” despite conveying a similar meaning. However, distinguishing between suggestive and descriptive marks can be challenging. Microsoft, known for its software for microcomputers, and Citibank, offering financial services, are examples of well-known suggestive marks. These names provide consumers with a clear idea of the company’s focus without requiring additional education or advertising.

Next on the scale are arbitrary marks, which often involve using existing words in unrelated ways. For instance, Chocolate Screwdrivers might work. A classic instance of an arbitrary mark is Apple Computers, distinct from Apple Records.

Lastly, fanciful marks are generally the most likely to be approved. Fanciful marks can be newly invented words or rarely used terms unrelated to product description. For instance, “Glotz” for a screwdriver company could work. Yahoo!, Google, Exxon, and Spotify are examples of fanciful marks. They are unique and tend to secure approval easily.

Additional common reasons for USPTO name rejections include:

• Similarity to an existing registered name.
• Being a surname.
• Descriptive of the business location.
• Disparaging nature.
• Translation of a foreign term into a generic or descriptive English term.
• Usage of an individual’s name or likeness, or being the title of a single book or movie.

Please also review our PRECAUTIONS BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

Traditionally, trademarks are utilized to officially register names, logos, or slogans associated with the trade of goods.

In contrast, service marks are commonly employed to officially register names, logos, or slogans connected to the provision of services.

"Intent to Use" applications can prove beneficial for upcoming marks that are yet to be utilized in the sale of goods or services. These applications can establish a company's position in the queue based on the filing date, even if the mark is not yet being used for commerce. The company typically needs to sell goods or services bearing the mark to maintain its position in line and validate the application, subsequently updating the USPTO. If circumstances warrant, the company might opt to file a "Statement of Use," which can be facilitated through a customized portal on Trademark File Help. This should generally be done within six months of registering an "Intent to Use" trademark. If justified, up to five additional six-month extensions may be requested and granted.

Please also review our PRECAUTIONS BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

Frequently, a trademark owner will dispatch a cease and desist letter requesting the infringing party to halt their use of the mark. In many cases, the infringement may not be intentional, and the party using the mark may cease their activities upon realizing that they are infringing upon another's rights.

However, the infringing party might choose to disregard the cease and desist letter or assert that their actions do not constitute infringement. If this occurs, you may contemplate initiating a trademark infringement lawsuit. If you're considering this route, it's advisable to consult with an attorney to assess the appropriateness of this step for your circumstances.

Successful trademark infringement lawsuits typically share certain characteristics, and you should confer with legal counsel to determine if any of these factors apply to your situation:

• The plaintiff holds a valid mark, a presumption often supported by a federal trademark registration.
• The opposing party is using the mark without authorization in conjunction with the sale of goods or services.
• The opposing party's use of the mark is likely to cause confusion among reasonable consumers.

Also, please familiarize yourself with our IMPORTANT GUIDELINES BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

A way to comprehend a trademark is that it's a term, expression, emblem, and/or configuration that identifies and separates where goods come from between different parties. A "service" mark sets apart the origin of a service, as opposed to a good, though both are usually known as "trademarks" or "marks." In broader language, securing a trademark safeguards a brand. Numerous widely recognized brands, logos, and slogans that you admire, recognize, and trust have undergone registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

In general, obtaining a trademark registration grants the registrant an assumption of brand ownership nationwide and an implied entitlement to use the brand across the entire country. This can potentially deter someone from registering a perplexingly similar brand at a later time and may also empower the registrant to bring a lawsuit in federal court if someone violates the brand. Once registered, the registrant is typically authorized to include the ® symbol after the name, logo, or slogan.

Following proper registration and usage of a mark for a five-year duration, Trademark File Help can assist in filing a "Declaration of Incontestability." This is often deemed the highest level of protection under U.S. trademark law, and it might help prevent challenges to a trademark based on the following reasons: (1) the mark lacks inherent distinctiveness; (2) it's confusingly akin to another mark that another party used first; or (3) the mark is essentially functional rather than serving as an identifier of the goods or services' source.

Also, please make sure to review ESSENTIAL INFORMATION BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

In the United States, a "common law trademark" is typically established when a business utilizes a name, logo, or slogan in commerce, even without formal registration. But why invest in registering a trademark when a common law one might already exist? Common law rights usually apply within a specific geographic area, unlike the broader national protection provided by a registered mark with the USPTO. Unregistered marks are confined to their local area, which can limit brand expansion. Conversely, someone operating within a restricted region might face challenges if a similar mark is registered offensively by another party. Moreover, trademark registration can provide legal advantages, including establishing validity and usage dates for potential future litigation involving trademark infringement. Registered trademark owners also have access to favorable remedies during legal disputes. Finally, once a trademark is accepted by the USPTO, it remains in their database, serving as a deterrent against future use by others. This ensures that potential businesses are aware that the mark is already claimed, thereby reducing the likelihood of conflicts.

Please also read WHAT YOU MUST KNOW BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.